While flexibility ensures secure system operation at a lower cost compared to building new infrastructure, the cost of balancing the power system continues to rise, driven by the increasing share of variable renewable generation. Figure 2 shows the annual cost of balancing services procured by the GB electricity system operator. It illustrates three main categories: Response, which includes services aimed at providing frequency support to the power system; Reserve, which encompasses various types of reserve services including Short Term Operating Reserve (STOR), Negative Reserve, Fast Reserve; and Constraints which accounts for services to support reactive power and voltage, as well as transmission congestion management.

Figure 2. Cost of balancing the GB electricity system. The figure was created using data published by National Grid Electricity System Operator[1]. For each year the cost covers the period of April to March in the following year.
The total balancing cost has increased fourfold over five years, with particular increases in the cost of reserve and constraint. Because of this increase in costs, there is a growing need for cost-effective alternative sources of flexibility. Energy storage and demand response initiatives can support the transition to a low-carbon energy system. For example, the integration of the electricity and heating sectors through optimal operation of “power-to-heat” technologies and thermal storage (in the form of hot water tanks, and also as thermal storage using the thermal inertia of district heating networks and buildings) enables greater flexibility in electricity demand for heating.